Happy Birthday Michheadmaster!
 

Happy birthday Mich!

Hope you enjoy it and it's filled with many spankings!

xoxo,
Kate

Cool this is the first time I get to wish someone a Happy Birthday here. Hope it was a good one filled with LOTS of "one to grow on" spankings.

I hope your birthday was wonderful. So does a Birthday Spanking for you mean giving one? I think that would be a lovely present. Sigh, too bad I couldn't be there for your birthday....

Would you take his licks for him, Vivian? ;)

What kind of licks do you mean? ;) If you can't lick 'um join 'um. Oh, my, did I say that? What if the headmaster finds out!?!

You would make a good lawyer, wouldn't you, vivian? ;) Twist those words to the meaning that gets you the most benefit. :D

Dammit, I'm late again to the thread! Maybe I need to be spanked.

Nah!! :D

Thank you so much, katie, iggy, RG, vivian, Black Velvet

(Actually, I did get a spanking. No pics, though) :cool:

I'd make a good Attorney? Thank you, that is a very nice complement. But our headmaster is too late for this thread again. Maybe he needs help with his "briefs". Oh, sorry another pun about bottoms - I'll stay away from dirty cracks like that.... doh!

I wonder if there is such a thing as court ordered spankings? Hmmmmm.... sounds like the theme for a new story. Maybe call it "My Assidavid". A new means to execute the judgment and pursue collection from the losing party's "assets" and a streemlined restitution for Breach of Contract!

So would you would report to the Corrections Deartment? or maybe a 3rd party subcontractor..... Wow!!! Like Our Headmaster!!!

My crack isn't dirty, I'll have you know. :D

But yours is about to be a lovely shade of red and purple if you don't watch it, viv.

And having reviewed the assidavit of counsel, I now order that counsel will be bound over (the bench) for trial. The court will first probe counsel for evidentiary purposes.

(Sheesh, my puns are bad today)

Looks like you're both making butts of yourselves. :D

Your puns are indeed bad, and taking me on is a gamble Sir. After all I'll see you and Raise you every time. But then again its your call.

No we are just being cheeky.

So Councelor, the question remains: "what law should be applied to the case at hand?" or more suscinctly "what hand should be applied to the case?" Put another way if I consent to the Discovery process: (reference:) "order that counsel will be bound over (the bench) for trial. The court will first probe counsel for evidentiary purposes." On what grounds will such intrusion (aka probe) be made? MN or MI ? The statutes for Minnesota and Michigan may not concur.... Other than those govenering the "little brown jug".

Viv, the only thing you'll be raising are those cute buns on command to meet my hand on every swat, or else. :D

And in a conflict between MN and MI law, HM (HeadMaster) law will control. This could prove to be a seminal case, as the dark recesses of the law will be explored in depth.

BTW, who was it who said "The law is an ass"?

A wise man, no doubt.

If your first case fails because of the above, vivian, don't give up. Make another try using a different angle. That would be a good...ummm...re-tort.